Serving New York veterinarians since 1890  |  Pet Owners: Get Help

New York State Veterinary Medical Society

NYSVMS Pulse Report

The year in New York veterinary medicine

We’ve been tracking the trends shaping New York veterinary medicine since the pandemic. Here’s what changed between Q3 2025 and Q3 2026 — the same quarter, one year apart — in your own words.

Q3 2025 · July
55 members responded
Q3 2026 · Practice Pulse
79 members responded

About this data

These results come from 55 members in Q3 2025 and 79 in Q3 2026 — roughly 3–4% of our members. That’s a self-selected sample, so read this as the views of members who chose to respond, not a precise census of the whole membership. At this size, any single percentage carries a margin of about ±11–13 points. Year over year, the two changes large enough to be statistically meaningful are the rise in burnout and the drop in revenue growth; the rest are directional — worth watching, not firm trends.

The short version

What holds up, and what to watch

  • Burnout rose. Staff-reported stress went from 3.04 to 3.54 out of 5 — the one sentiment change big enough to clear the margin of error.
  • Revenue sentiment cooled. Practices reporting growth fell from 35% to 13% (and those reporting any decline rose from 30% to 43%) — a drop too large to be chance.
  • Cost and workforce dominate what you want addressed. Rising veterinary costs (60%) and LVT shortages (56%) top the list, as they have in every wave.
  • Technology is climbing. Any record-keeping tech rose from 19% to 32% and AI scribes from 13% to 22% — a real move, though at this sample size read it as a clear direction rather than an exact figure.
  • Most other shifts are directional. Staffing shortages, capacity, and the individual issue percentages ticked around a little but stay within the margin. Watch them, don’t bank on them.

Sentiment & pressure

How the work feels right now

Questions asked identically in both quarters on a 0–5 scale, ordered by the size of the year-over-year change. A higher score means members reported more of that condition.

Staff stress / burnout 0 = none · 5 = severe
Q3 ’25
3.04
Q3 ’26
3.54
+0.50 YoY · n=53→76
Staff shortages (overall) 0 = none · 5 = severe
Q3 ’25
2.75
Q3 ’26
3.17
+0.42 YoY · n=53→77
Client visits (up / down) 0 = way down · 5 = way up
Q3 ’25
3.00
Q3 ’26
2.93
-0.07 YoY · n=52→74
Turning clients away (capacity) 0 = never · 5 = constantly
Q3 ’25
2.96
Q3 ’26
2.82
-0.14 YoY · n=53→76
3rd-party telemedicine impact 0 = none · 5 = major
Q3 ’25
2.31
Q3 ’26
2.30
-0.01 YoY · n=48→69
The read: burnout is the one indicator that moved beyond the margin of error (stress +0.50, statistically significant). Shortages also rose (+0.42) but sit within the noise at this sample size, and visit volume, capacity, and telemedicine impact held steady. Bars are averages; treat small gaps as flat.

The economy

Revenue sentiment cooled

Share of respondents in each category. The shift from Q3 2025 to Q3 2026 is hard to miss — the “revenue up” block shrank by roughly a third and the decline blocks grew.

Q3 2025
n=52
35%
35%
15%
15%
Q3 2026
n=67
13%
43%
24%
19%
Revenue has increasedAbout the sameRevenue decrease <10%Revenue decrease of 10%+

An outside check

How this squares with independent data

Vetwatch tracks actual transactions from veterinary practices across the country. Their New York numbers for 2026 point the same way our members do — and New York is holding up a little better than the country as a whole.

Practice revenue
+3.9%
U.S. +2.7%
Patient visits
-2.0%
U.S. -2.3%
Unique clients
-1.3%
U.S. -1.7%
Patients (pets) seen
-1.7%
U.S. -2.2%
Why this matters: revenue is up while visits, clients, and patients are all down slightly — practices are billing more per visit even as fewer animals come through the door. That’s the same squeeze members described in their comments, and it’s reassuring to see an independent dataset land in the same place as our own survey. It also puts the survey’s “revenue cooled” finding in context: members feel the growth slowing, even as price increases keep the top line positive.

Source: Vetwatch (vetwatch.com), New York, year-to-date 2026 (updated late July 2026). National figures shown for comparison.

Your priorities

What members most want addressed

Percent selecting each issue (multiple selections allowed), ordered by the Q3 2026 share. The chip shows the year-over-year change.

Q3 2025Q3 2026
Rising veterinary costs
▲ +4 pts
56%
60%
LVT shortages
▼ -2 pts
58%
56%
DVM shortages
▼ -11 pts
54%
43%
Access to care (low-income)
▲ +5 pts
37%
42%
Rude / abusive clients
▲ +2 pts
40%
42%
Urgent / emergent care shortage
▼ -4 pts
40%
36%
Loss of professional community
▲ +1 pts
31%
32%
Telemedicine without VCPR
▼ -4 pts
27%
23%
Managing student debt
▲ +9 pts
12%
21%

Technology

Record-keeping & AI

Share using any record-keeping tech, and the subset on latest-generation AI scribe apps.

Q3 ’25
19%
Q3 ’26
32%
+13 pts
Any record-keeping technology · n=53→72
Q3 ’25
13%
Q3 ’26
22%
+9 pts
Latest-gen AI scribe apps specifically

Payments

Credit-card surcharging

Percent answering “Yes.” Still a minority practice, but nearly doubled in a year.

Q3 ’25
13%
Q3 ’26
24%
+11 pts
n=52→71
Each quarter a slice still answered “I thought it was illegal to charge more for credit card transactions!” (6% → 7%) — a possible member-education opportunity.

New this year

Questions we added in Q3 2026

The Q3 2026 Practice Pulse added four questions with no Q3 2025 equivalent. (Two 2025 items were retired: H5N1 impact — low and falling at 0.4/5 — and “experience with Buoy’s Law.”)

NEW
2.94/5
LVT-specific shortage — nearly as acute as overall staff shortages (3.17), confirming techs as the pinch point. n=77

Support-staff compensation change

last 3 months · n=72
No change
62%
Yes, modestly
28%
Yes, significantly
10%

Near-term operational plans

select all · n=69
Hiring
54%
None of these
43%
Expanding hours / locations
7%
Reducing staff or hours
6%

AI / new tech adopted beyond record-keeping

select all · n=74
None of these
49%
AI-assisted imaging / radiology
32%
Client scheduling
19%
Client communication
18%
Clinical triage / decision support
3%
The read: about half of practices report no AI use beyond records yet; where it has landed, AI-assisted imaging leads, then scheduling and client communication.

In members’ own words

The comments behind the numbers

Every wave invites open comments. These are anonymized and lightly edited for length — individual responses stay confidential. They cluster around a few themes.

The LVT squeeze

“I’m an LVT who recently quit. The staffing shortage was so bad we were drowning — staying over an hour late, no lunch break several days a week. I was burnt out and simply couldn’t do it anymore. It is not worth it for the minimal pay. LVTs need a substantial pay increase if clinics want the shortage to get better.”— a licensed veterinary technician who left the field
“Technicians do not make enough money across the board to survive alone. Many of us have second and third jobs outside our full-time tech positions. We pour our hearts out for this job, but we are exhausted trying to survive ourselves.”

Hiring is stuck

“I’m a one-doctor private practice stuck at one doctor, because no one will answer any of my ads for DVMs or LVTs. I have the business to be a three-doctor practice, but there’s no one to hire.”
“We’ve been trying to hire a DVM since February and LVTs since May. Hiring sites are horrible. We’re going to have to cut services one day a week in September because we don’t have a surgeon available.”

Prices up, visits down

“Transactions are down by 200 visits for the year according to my software. Our average transaction is up because we’ve raised prices, so we’re making about the same revenue — but this will be unsustainable at some point. Fewer clients are seeking care or able to afford it.”
“The price increases are making it nearly impossible to provide preventative medicine. We barely had any surgeries in July because people can’t afford it — they’re seeking lower-cost options or not having procedures done.”

Access, and staying connected

“There are virtually no ER facilities in rural America. Even in NYS, clients have to drive an hour from most anywhere outside a metro area to get ER care — and in a real emergency, that almost always ends in heartbreak.”
“Lack of in-person meetings from local NYSVMS — feeling disconnected and isolated.”

Add your voice

The Pulse Report is only as good as your responses

These numbers come straight from NYSVMS members. The Practice Pulse survey is open now — a few minutes of your time shapes how we advocate for the profession, and the more of you who weigh in, the sharper the picture gets.

Take the Survey

Serving New York veterinarians since 1890.

About this report. A year-over-year comparison of the July 2025 (Q3 2025) and Q3 2026 Practice Pulse surveys. Response counts (n) vary by question because items were optional. These are independent samples of the membership, not a tracked panel, so treat the changes as directional. Multi-select questions (priorities, AI, plans) sum to more than 100%. Published by the New York State Veterinary Medical Society, August 2026.